companydirectorylist.com  全球商业目录和公司目录
搜索业务,公司,产业 :


国家名单
美国公司目录
加拿大企业名单
澳洲商业目录
法国公司名单
意大利公司名单
西班牙公司目录
瑞士商业列表
奥地利公司目录
比利时商业目录
香港公司列表
中国企业名单
台湾公司列表
阿拉伯联合酋长国公司目录


行业目录
美国产业目录














  • How Exactly Do You Define Truth? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
    Well, the truth itself is the way things are, and like you're saying, there isn't so much we can do to further define that It just is But there's a second consideration, which is that humans make claims about the way things are These claims may be considered as sequences of characters, or noises, or perhaps patterns of mental activity And we call some of these claims true, and other claims
  • logic - What is the difference between Fact and Truth? - Philosophy . . .
    Truth is what the singer gives to the listener when she’s brave enough to open up and sing from her heart But still curious about the difference between both of them In our daily life, in general conversation, we generally use these both terms interchangeably Then what is the difference? Are they synonym or have specific difference?
  • What is the philosophical difference between Reality and Truth?
    Truth is a property of propositions, mostly propositions claiming facts Hence truth lives in a completely different domain "It rains today" is a proposition which claims a fact The proposition can be true or false On the other hand, facts are not true or false Instead, they are or they are not See also What is the difference between Fact
  • Can truth exist without language? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
    5 "Whether truth can exist without language" and "that truth is an objective reality that exists independently of us" are not opposed claims, although they don't imply one another A Platonist would tell you that language, like other mental objects, exists in the ideal realm whether people are around to think about it or not
  • logic - The absolute truth paradox - Philosophy Stack Exchange
    "There is no absolute truth because we as humans are restrained from ever knowing it" is fallacious, what humans can know imposes no restriction on what is And "this" will only be a way out of the paradox after it specifies which axioms of classical logic are supposed to be dropped, and shows that what is left is enough and otherwise reasonable There are several options described in standard
  • logic - Is finding truth possible? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
    Finding truths is definitely possible, finding important truths harder; finding all important truths is much, much harder, and maybe impossible except for the truly enlightened - and these people are rare
  • Is there such a thing as absolute proof? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
    Rubbish Truth and wisdom are inseparable, questions and truth are inseparable How could you even ask a meaningful question without beginning from some truth? What meaning does "wisdom" have without reference to some truth?
  • How can we attain ‘truth’ if all we can do is justification?
    OP: " How can we attain ‘truth’ if all we can do is justification? " This comes down to the idea that there are historically two forms of truth: the truth of the pre-Socratics and that of the Platonists For the pre-Socratics the truth is what is, as presented, whereas for the Platonists truth means the correspondence of the presented form with its idea — or in the OP's terms its




企业名录,公司名录
企业名录,公司名录 copyright ©2005-2012 
disclaimer |iPhone手机游戏讨论 |Android手机游戏讨论 |海外商家点评 |好笑有趣影片图片